From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-11 10:00:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator4-cogent.newsfeed.com!propagator2-sterling!in.nntp.be!news.codefab.com!att541!att542!ip.att.net!newsfeed3.global.lmco.com!svlnews.lmms.lmco.com!not-for-mail From: "Xenos" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:42:58 -0500 Organization: Lockheed Martin Corporation Message-ID: References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org> <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com> <2460735.u7KiuvdgQP@linux1.krischik.com> <54759e7e.0402081525.50c7adae@posting.google.com> <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com> <54759e7e.0402101819.95cec1d@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.187.68.119 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5443 comp.lang.c:21915 comp.lang.c++:18734 comp.lang.java:2859 Date: 2004-02-11T12:42:58-05:00 List-Id: "Preben Randhol" wrote in message news:slrnc2kn4d.aav.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@k-083152.nt.ntnu.no... > > Yes, you won't get a buffer overflow. > You wouldn't of gotten a buffer overflow either way, it would have raised a constraint_error. DrX