From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f5d71,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,304c86061dc69dba X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-10 06:12:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.netkonect.net!news-peer0-test!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Message-ID: References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org> <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com> <2460735.u7KiuvdgQP@linux1.krischik.com> <54759e7e.0402081525.50c7adae@posting.google.com> <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com> <22jh209rupt9e957iloaus9fn34ofm0qt3@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-129-12-210.in-addr.btopenworld.com X-Trace: titan.btinternet.com 1076422276 1074 81.129.12.210 (10 Feb 2004 14:11:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:11:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5397 comp.lang.c:21614 comp.lang.c++:18453 comp.lang.java:2835 Date: 2004-02-10T14:11:16+00:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message news:22jh209rupt9e957iloaus9fn34ofm0qt3@4ax.com... > >Not quite... > >...they share a back-end - GNAT does NOT translate Ada source into C as an > >intermediate. > > Yes of course, GNU C is just a name of a set of compilers. Important > is that the back-end is same, so it is unlikely for GNAT to be slower > than GNU C. Theoretically Ada as a language should allow better > optimization than C. For total pedantry, GCC is the name for the set of compilers, GNU C is one element in this set.