From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,304c86061dc69dba
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-10 02:10:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!news.net.uni-c.dk!not-for-mail
From: David Rasmussen <david.rasmussen@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java
Subject: Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping
 language)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:10:28 +0100
Organization: UNI-C
Message-ID: <c0aa3o$i3t$1@news.net.uni-c.dk>
References: <20040206174017.7E84F4C4114@lovelace.ada-france.org>
 <mailman.3.1076142690.295.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <m3isij11u4.fsf_-_@insalien.org>
 <54759e7e.0402071124.322ea376@posting.google.com>
 <2460735.u7KiuvdgQP@linux1.krischik.com>
 <54759e7e.0402081525.50c7adae@posting.google.com>
 <Xns9489AEC0F8702jimmaureenrogers@204.127.36.1>
 <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: oek.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.net.uni-c.dk 1076407225 18557 62.61.154.25 (10 Feb 2004 10:00:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.net.uni-c.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:00:25 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <54759e7e.0402091826.2847e0c@posting.google.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5386 comp.lang.c:21575
 comp.lang.c++:18422 comp.lang.java:2830
Date: 2004-02-10T11:10:28+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

MSG wrote:
> 3. not very performance demanding (don't know about other compilers,
> but they say GNAT produces slow executables)
> 

Who says that? Ada can be at least as fast as C++.

/David, writing from comp.lang.c++