From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ? Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:38:25 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231515505 32073 127.0.0.1 (9 Jan 2009 15:38:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.10; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3231 Date: 2009-01-09T07:38:25-08:00 List-Id: Hello every body out there, :) Beside of the famous UML, there is another one : BON, which stands for Business Object Notation. BON, comes from the world of Eiffel users, seems relevant, but did not caught the celebrity of UML. Just as a kind of quick poll, the request "Unified Modeling Language" returns 1 310 000 results on google.fr, while the request "Business Object Notation" returns a little as 1 710 on the same search engine. There are some criticisms about UML, among these, one wich I share : not easy to communicate with peoples with a such complex notation. BON is much simpler. Perhaps the reason why UML is so much popular is beceause of a good marketing strategy which help it to reach this level of celebrity, .... or perhaps beceause it is good. If the reason is =93Beceause UML is good=94, one question which may incidentally comes, could be "is BON less good than UML" ? ..... or is it just beceause UML started to occupy all places befor BON comes into live ? Did you, Ada users, or curious-interested people, ever eval the relevance of BON ? What do you think about it ? Many thanks for any intellectual materials Yannick.