From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c2b3e0a81ca523a4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-14 02:23:02 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: cjkywt@hotmail.com (Sergey)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada compiler
Date: 14 Apr 2004 02:23:01 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <c0630a89.0404140123.70e953f1@posting.google.com>
References: <c0630a89.0404090635.2755fb7@posting.google.com>
 <GyAdc.8$QV3.3@dfw-service2.ext.ray.com>
 <c5eie0$nos0$1@ID-218515.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.25.172.9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1081934582 5736 127.0.0.1 (14 Apr 2004 09:23:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7081
Date: 2004-04-14T02:23:01-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marc A. Criley" <mcNOSPAM@mckae.com> wrote in message 
> Ditto, this is what I do, never had any problems with it.
> I compile the exact same code from the 3.15p baseline under gcc 3.2.3 and it
> compiles and runs fine--I've noticed no differences in execution. (And I
> admit being a bit surprised about my lack of problems given the reports of
> 3.2 problems.) The only compilation difference is 3.2.3 warnings that the
> pragma "Unreferenced" is unknown.

Ok, I don't know exactly but the only thing that I can said for
certain - it isn't that good. I've tried to compile aws-1.4.0 using
3.2.3. Compilation finished well, but regression tests have badly
failed...


> My software, DTraq (www.dtraq.com/dtraq.html), heavily uses tasking and the
> GUI is implemented with GtkAda, and so far--knock on wood--my experience
> with the output of the two compilers has been one of identical execution.
> (DTraq also uses ASIS, which isn't available for 3.2.3, so I can't compile
> that portion of DTraq of course, but the output of the 3.15p version of the
> executable that employs ASIS is usable by the remainder of the tool, so
> everything ends up working just fine.)
> 
> Marc A. Criley
> McKae Technologies
> m c @ m c k a e . c o m

Sincerely, 
Sergey E. Volkov.