From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd2f984f8ef238d1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Britt Snodgrass Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why so hard to come up with a simple embedded Ada system? Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <37da1783-b355-4d43-a9a8-7f0d4ba4da9c@t13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <6z43tsypm0g7$.1n3qizisulnrs$.dlg@40tude.net> <3fb3f705-d0f2-4323-8215-19ed91adbe24@c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4c41da73$0$6890$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <65607c17-b815-47e8-b6ad-d83ac2f154b2@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.252.170.138 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1279466795 3463 127.0.0.1 (18 Jul 2010 15:26:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.252.170.138; posting-account=rdRzuwoAAAAyW3CSBhs_xgfCUJSc1aNt User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12462 Date: 2010-07-18T08:26:35-07:00 List-Id: On Jul 18, 6:48=A0am, jonathan wrote: > More on GNAT AVR at: > > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/avr-ada/index.php?title=3DTutorial > > J. Yes, that is for the original 8-bit AVR. Someone has also ported GNAT to the 32-bit AVR32 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR32). See http://folk.ntnu.no/gregerts/avr32gnat/ and http://preview.tinyurl.com/= 32vj95t I think both types of AVR would be good projects for the c.l.a. community to support, along with ARM and eventually MSP430 embedded targets. - Britt