From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-04 06:57:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes? Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1075906622 16162 134.91.1.34 (4 Feb 2004 14:57:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:57:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5226 Date: 2004-02-04T14:57:02+00:00 List-Id: Peter C. Chapin wrote: : In article , : spam@spam.com says... : :> Is this a troll? You'll find ample discussion of this (naming types and :> packages) if you search c.l.a at groups.google.com. Some people are very :> attached to one approach or the other. : : Okay, so in other words either approach is considered acceptable by the : community at large. Unless I have missed it there is another style which uses plural for packages and singular for types. Thus you can have package Dates is type Date is ...; and then Dates.operation(today, ...); -- Georg