From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-03 06:23:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.stueberl.de!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Nature of XML Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <657ea3e3.0402021735.42d47367@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1075818194 26661 134.91.1.34 (3 Feb 2004 14:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:23:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5198 Date: 2004-02-03T14:23:14+00:00 List-Id: Robert C. Leif wrote: : It depends on what one means as XML. : XSL, o.K. : XSL Fo, Is there any kind of programming in specifying formatting objects? : and XForms o.K., mostly XPath+ predicates. : have : methods (subprograms). : Therefore, I would consider them to be : rudimentary, specialized programming languages. XSL is not exactly rudimentary I think. It is an extensible "functional" programming language, i.e. only in mode parameters (with overloading of function names, BTW).