From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-29 03:14:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <bvapuc$c9u$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <bub5n8$kf5$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
   <bv5gtp$qvs$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> <LsudnVQN4LxMFIvdRVn-gQ@comcast.com>
 <fGxRb.49248$Kg6.361048@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <pan.2004.01.27.18.56.15.347278@email.ro>
 <x7vznc9ghv3.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <pan.2004.01.27.22.41.11.782980@email.ro>
 <mailman.46.1075258237.2270.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.01.28.03.33.49.557667@email.ro>
 <mailman.56.1075345419.2270.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.01.29.06.56.58.838555@email.ro>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1075374860 12606 134.91.1.34 (29 Jan 2004
 11:14:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5033
Date: 2004-01-29T11:14:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

David Starner <dvdeug@email.ro> wrote:
: 
: Any evidence for this, or is this just jingoism?

Users of GNAT 3.15p have been able to work with 3.15p
for quite long. The 3.4 branch (not even released yet) of GCC has
an Ada front end which includes many corrections and improvements.
What is wrong with working with GCC 3.4 compilers if it is better
than 3.15p?

Latest and greatest = highest score in version number?
Versionitis.


Georg