From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6066104d6deadff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s72.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Organization: jrcarter at acm dot org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: protected type interrupts References: <1156430839.745932.279060@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.176 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s72 1156539463 12.201.97.176 (Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:57:43 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:57:43 GMT Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:57:44 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6386 Date: 2006-08-25T20:57:44+00:00 List-Id: Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: >> > But since you specified a priority for the PO (and assuming > priority_ceiling), you still execute at interrupt priority. Depending on > the hardware and how priorities are managed, this may delay or hide > actual interrupts. Right. I said that in another message, IIRC. The message you were replying to was mostly nit picking, correcting the OP's assumption that the entry was being executed BY the interrupt handler. -- Jeff Carter "This school was here before you came, and it'll be here before you go." Horse Feathers 48