From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-18 04:59:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Ronald Dauster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why ada is so unpopular ? Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:59:24 +0100 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: <49cbf610.0401170627.79c3dfe5@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p50810425.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: online.de 1074430767 9557 80.129.4.37 (18 Jan 2004 12:59:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:59:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4526 Date: 2004-01-18T13:59:24+01:00 List-Id: Szymon Guz wrote: > > well.. I know that, but my problem is a little bit different. I don't > have money for sth like Builder or Kylix or Visual but I think that my > program really needs to operate on some windows. I don't want to write > that using WinApi nor Gtk; First of all the Gtk/Qt licence is not good The Gtk and Qt licenses are substantially different. GTK is under LGPL and I do not see, where this creates a problem. Qt, of course, either requires your application to be licensed under GPL or you have to buy a commercial license. > for me and WinApi is terrible. I wanted to use wxWindows. It is written > in C++, that's why I still don't know what to choose. Mix wxWindows(C++) > with Ada or just use C++. As far as I know, there is no Ada binding to wxWindows and, given the size and programming style of wxWindows, it will be a _lot_ of work to create one.