From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2932429f9d2e3e54 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-18 03:08:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: Ronald Dauster Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ARM equivalents for C++ and Java Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 12:08:06 +0100 Organization: 1&1 Internet AG Message-ID: References: <468D78E4EE5C6A4093A4C00F29DF513D04B82B11@VS2.hdi.tvcabo> NNTP-Posting-Host: p50810425.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: online.de 1074424089 666 80.129.4.37 (18 Jan 2004 11:08:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4522 Date: 2004-01-18T12:08:06+01:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: > "amado.alves" writes: > > >>What would be the ARM equivalents for C++ and Java? I mean a public >>marked-up source? Thanks. (This is for an experiment in adaptive >>hypertext.) > > > Interesting. I was sure I had at one time read the Java language > reference on-line, but now I can't find it. Apparently Sun has decided > Java is popular enough that they can charge for the book. One more > point for Ada :). > No, the Java Language specification is now part of the J2SDK documentation bundle and also available at http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/index.html > I've never seen a C++ reference on line (mostly because I haven't > looked), but there probably some of the early drafts from the > standardization process available. > I do hava both an HTML and a PDF version of the 1997 C++ Public Review Document, but not of the final standard. The only online reference I've found is http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2356/index.html