From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-18 01:24:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.tiscali.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!proxad.net!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail
From: Szymon Guz <alpha@skynetSMIECI.VONorg.NOJUSZpl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: why ada is so unpopular ?
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:21:16 +0100
Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl/
Message-ID: <budjfo$n18$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <bub5n8$kf5$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
 <49cbf610.0401170627.79c3dfe5@posting.google.com>
 <buc87c$8p$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>
 <slrnc0je79.hlv.adi@ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.skynet.org.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nemesis.news.tpi.pl 1074417976 23592 195.116.185.50 (18 Jan 2004
 09:26:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:26:16 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008
X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <slrnc0je79.hlv.adi@ppc201.mipool.uni-jena.de>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4520
Date: 2004-01-18T10:21:16+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adrian Knoth wrote:

> Szymon Guz <alpha@skynetSMIECI.VONorg.NOJUSZpl> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Military uses. It's answer to question why unpopular.
>>
>>program and maybe in future earn on that and I still don't know what to 
>>choose ada or C++.
> 
> 
> If your program solves the problem then your clients won't ask which
> language do you've used.
> 
> If you're more common with C++, then use C++. If you need some
> libraries only available for C++, use C++. If you think you might
> get serious problems in quality when using C++, use Ada. ;)
> 
> And never forget: While the Ada-guys go out for lunch the C++-devision
> is still using the debugger ;) [don't remember the exact quote]
> 

well.. I know that, but my problem is a little bit different. I don't 
have money for sth like Builder or Kylix or Visual but I think that my 
program really needs to operate on some windows. I don't want to write 
that using WinApi nor Gtk; First of all the Gtk/Qt licence is not good 
for me and WinApi is terrible. I wanted to use wxWindows. It is written 
in C++, that's why I still don't know what to choose. Mix wxWindows(C++) 
with Ada or just use C++.