From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,XPRIO autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,83a56cb8370ebd04,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-07 05:00:25 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!comstar.ru!teleglobe.net!151.99.250.105.MISMATCH!news.finmeccanica.it!not-for-mail
From: "Riccardo" <kk@kk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: ADA vs JAVA sockets
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:39:28 +0100
Organization: studenti
Message-ID: <btggi3$evu$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.26.101.146
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4166
Date: 2004-01-07T09:39:28+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi!
I'm trying to put together two applications written respectively in ADA and
in JAVA.

Each one has its own socket mechanism (in ADA I use G N A T . S O C K E T S
ver. 1.27 and in JAVA the standard sockets: JAVA.net).

Using UDP protocol on a direct connection (no other machines in between)
when I have big quantities of data it appends that some data get lost.

Introducing some delays (in both directions: either receiving in ADA or
JAVA) the problem seems to be solved.


Is there someone that found the same difficulty?

Can I say thet JAVA brings such kind of problems?
(the same program in ADA works fine with an application written in C++)

Thanks!

Riccardo