From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac02560f0af03a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-26 10:01:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3FEC43B2.5080606@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1072461690 21802 134.91.1.34 (26 Dec 2003 18:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3820 Date: 2003-12-26T18:01:30+00:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote: : With : Gnat, it is both an Ada and a C compiler, so it is likely to be : consistent with itself. But Gnat couldn't promise you compatibility with : someone else's C compiler. However, the GNAT User's Guide has something to say about calling conventions and the stack at least wrt the different calling conventions on Windows systems.