From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e3f2eac5c026e3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-23 07:50:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: come from joke (was Re: Other Ada Standards (was Re: SIGada Conference) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <468D78E4EE5C6A4093A4C00F29DF513D04B82B08@VS2.hdi.tvcabo> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1072194602 28883 134.91.1.34 (23 Dec 2003 15:50:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:50:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3754 Date: 2003-12-23T15:50:02+00:00 List-Id: Peter Hermann wrote: :> So create a new keyword, contraction of "with" and "use" --> "wise" : : does anybody know where to find that delicious joke about : those advanced syntax constructs like "come from" (complement to goto) : or "not procname;"(negating call to proc) etc. etc. ? I think I've found it: A LINGUISTIC CONTRIBUTION TO GOTO- LESS PROGRAMMING We don't know where to GOTO if we don't know where we've COME FROM. This linguistic innovation lives up to all expectations R. LAWRENCE CLARK* http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/358027.358043 Reprinted courtesy of Datamation Magazine. (C) by Technical Publishing Co., a Dun & Bradstreet Co., 1984. All Rights Reserved. *The author is indebted to G. E Groner and N.A. Palley for a valuable discussion which took place in New Haven, Conn.