From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa18fb47ddd229a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-18 01:59:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!dialin-145-254-041-193.arcor-ip.NET!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Proposed change to BC iterator parameters Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:05:48 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-041-193.arcor-ip.net (145.254.41.193) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1071741572 7283078 145.254.41.193 ([77047]) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3530 Date: 2003-12-18T11:05:48+01:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > I'm still pushing for downward closures to be added to the language, > which would add at least a minimal amount of support for iterators, > and greatly simplify this and other data-structure proposals. Wouldn't subroutine types do the trick? I wonder why Ada does not have them. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de