From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8a402d78988bdf2b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-17 03:59:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!b98ef.b.pppool.DE!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [announcement] SYSAPI and SYSSVC for Windows Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:05:23 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: b98ef.b.pppool.de (213.7.152.239) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1071662351 6054477 213.7.152.239 ([77047]) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3499 Date: 2003-12-17T13:05:23+01:00 List-Id: Ekkehard Morgenstern wrote: > Note: The Windows Platform SDK documentation now (02/2003) states that > asynchronous file I/O is possible with Windows 95, 98 and ME (i.e. the > comments from some years before where it said it wasn't possible have been > removed). It could be that it's still not possible with those OSes, I > cannot verify this. If you can, please notify me of the results. I have used async I/O under Win95/98 3-4 years back from now. That was serial port I/O. It worked that time. Maybe it will not, just because MS claims that it will. (:-)) -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov www.dmitry-kazakov.de