From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-20 10:20:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:16:16 -0500 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: <3FB3751D.5090809@noplace.com> <49cbf610.0311191248.7eb48a43@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2756 Date: 2003-11-20T13:16:16-05:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message news:jioprvkn6v025drp4qf1iuolqdto3rtd89@4ax.com... > However there is a true long term perspective problem with nuclear > energy. Nuclear energy shifts the temperature balance, because it is a > source of energy indendent from what we are receiving from the sun. At > the present level it is nothing and will remain nothing for a very > long period of time. But some day it will be necessary to find a way > to radiate the heat dissipated in the atmosphere into space. How would that compare to the extra energy that the earth traps from increase of CO2 in the air? ;-)