From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-20 08:33:54 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!uio.no!feed.news.nacamar.de!news.f.de.plusline.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Nuclear Waste (Was Re-Marketing Ada)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <bpiqdi$edn$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: 
 <slrnbqug4j.ss.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
   <JtPsb.8014$fB3.463946@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <bebbba07.0311161831.bce38a5@posting.google.com>
 <Az7ub.3669$ZF1.458179@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <oH8ub.4782$n56.638@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <jL9ub.34$2z1.1706@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <I_aub.9262$3o6.6712@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <49cbf610.0311191248.7eb48a43@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0311192231.48b3056a@posting.google.com>
 <SqmdnVW4jrTaViGiRVn-sA@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1069346034 14775 134.91.1.34 (20 Nov 2003
 16:33:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2746
Date: 2003-11-20T16:33:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert I. Eachus <rieachus@comcast.net> wrote:
: the net risk 
: from nuclear power plants is negative--they save more lives than they 
: consume.

Does this net risk take into account the fact that no major nuclear
disasters have happened during the last 25 years in the USA?
If it does, how would you compare an exploding nuclear power
plant to an exploding coal burner, in terms of risk?



Goerg