From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd9a8f91bb89a8d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-19 14:25:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsxfer.eecs.umich.edu!elk.ncren.net!nntp.upenn.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is it possible to build an Ada cross-compiler for an 8-bit embedded target now that gcc 3.X has support for Ada? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:23:57 -0500 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2699 Date: 2003-11-19T17:23:57-05:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" wrote in message news:vrnjndmn0vqge6@corp.supernews.com... > Testing can never prove the absense of bugs; unless you're using > SPARK, you have to assume there are still some in there. Well non-exhaustive testing cannot prove the absense of bugs ;) Furthermore, SPARK can only guaruntee the absence of certain bugs (problem specification errors are outside of SPARK's scope). Thus, it is always safe to assume that there are bugs in your software. ;-)