From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-18 09:15:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!In.nntp.be!gumby.it.wmich.edu!aanews.merit.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Re-Marketing Ada (was "With and use")
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:11:59 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <bpdjun$apo$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: 
 <slrnbqug4j.ss.randhol+valid_for_reply_from_news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB0B57D.6070906@noplace.com>
 <boqr49$1hc6fm$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <ZuudnWONTe-cnyyiRVn-iQ@gbronline.com>
 <bor2ji$1h7730$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB22125.1040807@noplace.com>
 <botbde$1hvqjj$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de> <3FB3751D.5090809@noplace.com>
 <JtPsb.8014$fB3.463946@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <bebbba07.0311161831.bce38a5@posting.google.com>
 <bp9dsl$2fau$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3FB8B9BC.5040505@noplace.com>
 <bpbae3$18ko$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3FBA1118.4060105@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2633
Date: 2003-11-18T12:11:59-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Marin David Condic" <nobody@noplace.com> wrote in message
news:3FBA1118.4060105@noplace.com...
> They are
> likely to look at your arguments and respond that these same qualities
> are available to a greater or lesser degree in other languages that are
> *new* and *going somewhere*. Ada has to offer them something fresh and
> new or they won't want to tie their careers or those of their students
> to a technology that is perceived as being on the way out.

I agree that nice new features, such as more libraries, should be added.
Btw, I never got the *new* argument.  Doesn't new imply more risks?  ;-)
Incidentally, the argument that Ada *is somewhere* and then listing all the
safety critical applications is a nice argument,  but I agree the Ada should
be somewhere and going to other places, too.

-CRM