From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-15 11:45:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!feed3.news.rcn.net!not-for-mail
From: "Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.FrankLho@rcn.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:44:13 -0500
Message-ID: <bp5vma$h27$1@bob.news.rcn.net>
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com> for reply from
 news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311132145.58a4541e@posting.google.com>
 <bp22op$1ltd$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311141523.3c523f8c@posting.google.com>
 <G-udnYiJ3bOJ2SuiRVn-tg@comcast.com> <3FB6513B.DA6E53CA@fakeaddress.nil>
Reply-To: "Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.FrankLho@rcn.com>
X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZEJ98rKbVGBRZGN4M3oqSc2SOo6j2osNRWXVLsCA/DfLE+GPgfZRSy
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Nov 2003 19:44:10 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Priority: 3
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2519
Date: 2003-11-15T19:44:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

One quick correction:

> * Ada 83 (and later) implies a non-written "with Standard; use Standard;"
>   - ASCII is subpackage of Standard.

Actually, all library level units are treated as part of the Standard
package. As a result, every Ada identifier can be written in a fully
qualified form starting with "Standard".

Other than the naming convention, however, the presence of a unit in the
Standard package is mostly equivalent to having "With Standard; use
Standard;" in front of the library unit.