From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-13 22:50:06 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:47:48 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <bp1tr6$1hik$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com> for reply from
 news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no> <3FAF8C99.5040201@noplace.com>
 <bebbba07.0311102320.7fba665a@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbr17j1.1qo.randhol+valid for reply from news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <boq8bm$1g79l6$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <75qdnZeRyrHs_imiRVn-sQ@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2475
Date: 2003-11-14T01:47:48-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:75qdnZeRyrHs_imiRVn-sQ@comcast.com...
> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
>
> > But it isn't clutter; with and use serve two different purposes so they
> > shouldn't be combined.
>
> As I have said before, what has come out of this discussion that is very
> worthwhile is the idea of adding, "use all {package name}" to the
> language.  There are places where having a single use clause instead of
> a series of them would be a big improvement.

I agree. I just don't want to see use's implying with's