From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-08 01:05:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsr1.ipcore.viaginterkom.de!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:04:54 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Message-ID: <boibjm$hff$1@sparta.btinternet.com>
References: <uekwr4u1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr> news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3FA777E9.4030605@noplace.com> <atRpb.673$143.30323@news20.bellglobal.com>
 <bebbba07.0311051108.a65b963@posting.google.com>
 <m365hyh65o.fsf@niflheim.malonet>
 <bebbba07.0311051910.4913df78@posting.google.com>
 <bod0mk$1cg6bn$2@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311061052.772a095@posting.google.com>
 <boe9es$ep5$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0311071231.239981ea@posting.google.com>
 <boh842$h8v$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0311080022.7066f205@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-129-48-51.in-addr.btopenworld.com
X-Trace: sparta.btinternet.com 1068282294 17903 81.129.48.51 (8 Nov 2003
 09:04:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:04:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2250
Date: 2003-11-08T09:04:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Russ" <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:bebbba07.0311080022.7066f205@posting.google.com...
> >    A := B * C;  -- would not require an extra copy
>
> I'm just a bit puzzled as to why you immediately shifted from "+" to
> "*".

It was really, really late... Nothing sinister!


> In any case, am I correct in assuming that AI-318 would eliminate
> *both* the copy operation *and* the temporary for matrix addition (as
> "+=" would do)? That is, can I use
>
>    A := A + B; -- or
>    A := B + C;
> and avoid both the temporary and the copy operation?

That's my reading of it.