From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d6589e7b2c60444
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-05 13:17:29 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!199.45.49.37!cyclone1.gnilink.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!news.compuserve.com!news-master.compuserve.com!not-for-mail
From: DPH <rally2xs@compuserve.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: employment with ada
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:19:40 -0400
Organization: CompuServe Interactive Services
Message-ID: <bohdbv07k3baao433n70c8nl3qi3p2ei9o@4ax.com>
References: <626e8ae.0305011636.5e899da3@posting.google.com>
 <4mo7bvc2n70k6eikm3muu2965nbo3m77ov@4ax.com> <3EB415CB.6D97B14D@adaworks.com>
 <1f3abv0c5majluvng6g19aheea80i63res@4ax.com>
 <tsecnZhUY7zNRyijXTWcog@gbronline.com>
 <61gcbvgb9ooldmb6jbn1ef3os1kk1hnfgg@4ax.com>
 <20030505084553.7a4ef0f8.falis@adelphia.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dca6-tgn-zmo-vty25.as.wcom.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ngspool-d02.news.aol.com 1052165841 9101 216.193.39.25 (5 May 2003
 20:17:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@compuserve.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 20:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36986
Date: 2003-05-05T16:19:40-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 05 May 2003 12:47:36 GMT, Ed Falis <falis@adelphia.net> wrote:

>I believe Rose RealTime is a different tool than Rose.  If it's what I'm
>thinking it is, it was acquired from a Canadian company (or as part
>of the company) and had never been fitted with an Ada adaptation layer
>or code generation. By the time Rational acquired it (late 90's?), they
>were already winding down on Ada.
>
>Just my recollection.
>
>- Ed

That "winding down" part is the problem.  One of the biggest Ada
boosters shouldn't be in a "Winding Down" mode for the langauge.

Its "Rational" to be concerned about one's future if one's only
experience is in Ada.

Dave Head