From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b70281e9df653875 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-07 09:06:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-feed1.de1.concert.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!61.11.230.176!not-for-mail From: Andreas Almroth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gcc/gnat 3.3 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:05:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3f8fff8b$1_1@news.tm.net.my> <3f98ec41_1@news.tm.net.my> <3f9ded55$1_2@news.tm.net.my> <3f9e8c01$1_2@news.tm.net.my> <_MDnb.37361$mZ5.190069@attbi_s54> <3fa348e4$1_1@news.tm.net.my> <3FA621A2.8020205@nowhere.com> <3FA9D6D1.9050803@nowhere.com> <3FA9DA39.3090607@nowhere.com> <3FA9EF9E.7040301@nowhere.com> <3FAA2DD5.5040503@nowhere.com> <3FAB1C53.5080007@nowhere.com> <3FAB468D.7030509@nowhere.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.11.230.176 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1068224770 48320357 61.11.230.176 (16 [198985]) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <3FAB468D.7030509@nowhere.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2216 Date: 2003-11-07T18:05:53+01:00 List-Id: Adrian Hoe wrote: > > So, the tasking problem is caused by Solaris 9. I'm sure ACT or someone > is working on this issue? Does anyone know of any progress? I would re-phrase that as; gnat/gcc 3.3.2 is using a non-portable way between Solaris releases of keeping track on threads in its run-time environment. I don't think Sun intended it to be used as it is used right now. It apparently cuts down the overhead during run-time, but to the cost of being non-portable. > > Too bad I don't have the Solaris 8 CDs. It came pre-installed with > Solaris 9 CDs bundled in SB150. :( I guess I will have to wait till a > gnat workaround has been released. :( > I believe the Solaris 8 CD's are still downloadable from sun.com if you have a good link and a cd-writer. > How about Solaris 10? I read there is a major work out on Solaris 10 > architecture. Any news? There are news, but not related to this news group. Check out comp.unix.solaris and the developer part of sun.com /Andreas