From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cbbf1799c1dc6da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:20:32 -0600
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <43CCAB76.6050907@mailinator.com>
 <11spsltn78ido25@corp.supernews.com> <43CD2724.3090204@obry.net>
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 box (<>) rules in default values
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:25:13 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <boCdnbq-sYQNzFDeRVn-tw@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-RFjHKlaKvgNUbqqPzk5o/svR3okp2R1XlWLhQgrvnN1HWx9XqroDnbB2syXdvuFwRWAHHJhSXW5943A!KtWp0nosc0rQ11cPqJue6NrVRFaiWyxMB1LJ718UkqO5Fewzo0pMk4nGCKK5M7FpUnnKWSbUXT5H
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2515
Date: 2006-01-17T14:25:13-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Pascal Obry" <pascal@obry.net> wrote in message
news:43CD2724.3090204@obry.net...
> ME a �crit :
> > When will a Ada 2005 compiler become publicly available i.e. gnat 16.0P?
>
> AFAIK there is no such beast yet! Compilers are being developed to
> support the new Ada 2005 features but no one is still 100% complete.

Nor could there be, as the Amendment isn't finished yet; we're in the
(hopefully) last round of formal comments. There probably will be a few
(small) changes in syntax and semantics from those comments, so even if a
compiler fully implemented draft 15, it would still not implement (exactly)
the final language.

(Of course, that is primarily of academic interest; most uses wouldn't run
into any of the changes.)

                   Randy Brukardt, Editor, 8652 AMD.1