From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3a175786beb9c7e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-12 18:35:23 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!hse-mtl-ppp74436.qc.sympatico.CA!not-for-mail
From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SourceForge vs Savannah
Date: 13 Oct 2003 01:35:21 GMT
Organization: cbbrowne Computing Inc
Message-ID: <bmcvgp$kgqu8$1@ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>
References: <un0c9gnny.fsf_-_@nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hse-mtl-ppp74436.qc.sympatico.ca (64.229.208.213)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1066008921 21523400 64.229.208.213 (16 [125932])
X-Draft-From: ("nntp+wolfe:comp.lang.ada" 1718)
X-message-flag: Outlook is rather hackable, isn't it?
X-Home-Page: http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/
X-Affero: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:759
Date: 2003-10-13T01:35:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

After a long battle with technology,Stephen Leake <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov>, an earthling, wrote:
> I'm considering moving my library to either SourceForge or Savannah. I
> was leaning towards Savannah, but then someone pointed out that being
> on SourceForge makes it easier for others to find, which is an
> important point.

That seems odd.

Google can as easily find projects in one place as in the other.

I would think it a good idea to be skeptical of the permanence of
either; nothing should prevent maintaining a CVS archive in _both_
places...
-- 
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/oses.html
Yes, for sparkling white chip prints, use low SUDSing DRAW....