From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c08a7609345f4e5 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Limited use for limited with? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <853314bc-0f79-435f-86a5-d7bcdd610731@c10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <36e886fa-b272-461f-bf86-a6b18366b64f@i5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <1eug9v5h5mf8d$.ud00hrz48lyr.dlg@40tude.net> <67044906-dacc-4526-b3f6-27e5323ab8fc@n3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <12chb4kbqt9ln$.zumsv1z9hqvk$.dlg@40tude.net> <292dd0bd-1fc4-4715-bb70-7655d0dc04eb@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <09c36bd6-edfa-42bf-8f33-e91b0a9b0737@26g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <1f38791b-a579-49ed-839c-e6ff3867de76@30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Oct 2010 22:19:09 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 23a08845.newsspool3.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=QL^okjK3@QM[kmHKHnaEnMMcF=Q^Z^V3H4Fo<]lROoRA8kF1@A\TYiM3K[6LHn;2LCVN[ On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:29:28 -0700 (PDT), Maciej Sobczak wrote: > On 11 Pa�, 08:23, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > >> IMHO, Interfaces are worthless. > > I hope you understand that this is a very strong statement. It > basically stands in direct opposition to the work that has been done > to introduce them into the language. How could it be otherwise if that work damaged Ada? I am pleasantly surprised that a prominent ARG member considers interfaces [at least] worthless. It is a progress, I would say. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de