From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,229ea0001655d6a2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Generic Package References: <1177539306.952515.222940@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1177601484.444701.171560@r35g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9eejm6rqip.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <19qllkvm6ut42$.1iqo74vjgmsrv$.dlg@40tude.net> <1177801611.10171.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1woad6hn9idy2$.6otnwphc1o0h$.dlg@40tude.net> <1n38bsd8xx0uc$.1eo1arncmwvkn.dlg@40tude.net> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:01:44 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hvZp7gx1KLg5LEEKjv+NvTB4cZo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.227.73 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1177926816 88.72.227.73 (30 Apr 2007 11:53:36 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15415 Date: 2007-04-30T12:01:44+02:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:36:53 +0100, (see below) wrote: > >> On 29/4/07 18:48, in article 1n38bsd8xx0uc$.1eo1arncmwvkn.dlg@40tude.net, >> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: >> >>> What about "polymorphism"? It means exactly the opposite to what its >>> translation suggests (many-formed/shaped). >> >> You have lost me. It means exactly what it says. > > But there is only one form (~interface) of a polymorphic thing. Substance ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Should be a strong indication that the 'poly' doesn't refer to the interface in the sense you're using the word. Are you ever assailed by doubt in situations like this? > (~implementation) is different. They should probably take "convergent" > instead. Converges to what? Regards -- Markus