From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,88ed72d98e6b3457
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-07 11:20:21 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsr1.ipcore.viaginterkom.de!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Standard Library Interest?
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Message-ID: <blv03f$ko1$1@titan.btinternet.com>
References: <TdJfb.5879$RU4.57294@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>
 <3F7F760E.2020901@comcast.net> <3F8035B0.7080902@noplace.com>
 <blpr1v$b2g$1@titan.btinternet.com> <3F816A35.4030108@noplace.com>
 <bls7ji$2u3$1@hercules.btinternet.com> <3F81FBEC.9010103@noplace.com>
 <6Ingb.30667$541.13861@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3F82B4A4.5060301@noplace.com>
 <S1zgb.27851$kD3.22334@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <3F82F527.3020101@noplace.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-128-239-244.in-addr.btopenworld.com
X-Trace: titan.btinternet.com 1065550767 21249 81.128.239.244 (7 Oct 2003
 18:19:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:386
Date: 2003-10-07T18:19:27+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <nobody@noplace.com> wrote in message
news:3F82F527.3020101@noplace.com...
> Well, yes, that's pretty much compatible with the idea I've been putting
> forward. If you have some group or organization overseeing some
> updatable library, people could contribute what they thought would be

Isn't this the job of the APIWG? I do believe they are supposed to
be producing ref-imps not just paper APIs.

It would be a Good Idea(tm) if everyone banged on at their compiler
vendor about this...