From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_WORDY, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1116ece181be1aea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-14 03:52:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail From: "Frank J. Lhota" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is the Writing on the Wall for Ada? Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:51:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: "Frank J. Lhota" X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVYM9KbzVDPdEjcfnZMLLMA8vvFQtU/NecM9/W2g/huhoNg0TjKOL79f X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Sep 2003 10:51:04 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42472 Date: 2003-09-14T10:51:04+00:00 List-Id: "Matthew Heaney" wrote in message news:uvfrvanu3.fsf@earthlink.net... > 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) writes: > What kind of "augmented" assignment operator did you have in mind? I'm fairly sure he means the sort of thing where instead of writing Item(Number).Inventory.Count := Item(Number).Inventory.Count + 1; you could write Item(Number).Inventory.Count +:= 1; This was discussed in a thread from earlier this year. Check out the "proposal for new assignment operators" thread from June 24. And for the record, I was in favor of augmented assignments.