From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52a0bacbcdd2da17
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-18 14:35:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Realtime/embedded project to help with employment.
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:32:11 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <bhrgl9$i4i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <mailman.10.1060906770.299.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbjp6oi.1ru.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhiqi3$1j2g$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbjps0o.6vl.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhj1de$1p9f$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbjs099.i2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhlrta$1d5i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbk0t28.2kl.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhqkm1$2o48$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbk1svg.73s.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhr6co$78h$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbk2dq2.73s.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41700
Date: 2003-08-18T17:32:11-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbk2dq2.73s.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
> >
> > Me: While <...> VCR.
> > You: My point exactly
> > Me: Then your point is wrong. <supporting arguments snipped>
> > You: Exactly. <rest of text>
>
> No. I was replying to the last paragraph that you wrote.

So you were either replying to

> I was staying within the confines of your argument
-or-
> Your stretching of the context of programming does not.
?

In either case, I think that we both can agree that while words can take on
many meanings, it is not good practice to use all the meanings at once. ;-)