From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52a0bacbcdd2da17
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-18 11:40:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Realtime/embedded project to help with employment.
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:36:57 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <bhr6co$78h$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <mailman.10.1060906770.299.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbjp6oi.1ru.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhiqi3$1j2g$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbjps0o.6vl.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhj1de$1p9f$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbjs099.i2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhlrta$1d5i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbk0t28.2kl.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bhqkm1$2o48$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <slrnbk1svg.73s.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41688
Date: 2003-08-18T14:36:57-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbk1svg.73s.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
> >> >> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
> >> >> > While I did make $10 once for programming a neighbor's VCR
> >
> > Look at this exchange ;-)
>
> See I can also change the content of a post so that your meaning alters
> :-P

*sigh*  I am not trying to twist your words.  I am showing you how the
structure of your replies is self-contradictory.
The contents I sniped were the supporting arguments for the line I did not
snip.

Me: While <...> VCR.
You: My point exactly
Me: Then your point is wrong. <supporting arguments snipped>
You: Exactly. <rest of text>

Your placement of the word 'exactly' indicates that you think that I am
right about you being wrong.  By reading further, I learn that this is not
true (no surprise here;-).  This is a very bad form when presenting an
argument.  I am perfectly willing to explain all of this in more detail via
private email if you wish.