From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 12:28:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: perl Date: 4 Oct 2001 14:28:01 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <9pgu0l01687@drn.newsguy.com> <3BBCA16D.3070608@home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1002223683 17905 192.135.80.34 (4 Oct 2001 19:28:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13736 Date: 2001-10-04T14:28:01-05:00 List-Id: In article <3BBCA16D.3070608@home.com>, "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" writes: > mike@nospam wrote: > >> In article , Pi says... > ... > >> >> first, perl is ugly. it is write-only language. > > > Heh, heh, that is the best explanation of perl I have ever heard! But stolen from descriptions of TECO and APL.