From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f039470e8f537101 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-21 08:57:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.CH!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ariane5 FAQ Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:54:55 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <1058799152.775376@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Reply-To: v.hoefler@acm.org NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.ch (213.200.246.247) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1058803020 15158244 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40561 Date: 2003-07-21T17:54:55+02:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen wrote: >Alexandre E. Kopilovitch wrote: > > there were no reasons to expect that it should work for this new = rocket > >That is a nonsensical remark. The Ariane 5 designers obviously >expected that it should work for their rocket, and work without >any changes, so to claim that there were no reasons to expect it >to work is silly. Obviously you are saying there were any reasons. So could you please explain what they were? Vinzent.