From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fba93c19bb4e7dbd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-19 07:50:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Q: Endless loop by dispatching Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:44:34 -0400 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: <3F0ED2C8.6080409@snafu.de> <3F1857E4.60702@attbi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40504 Date: 2003-07-19T10:44:34-04:00 List-Id: "Robert I. Eachus" wrote in message news:3F1857E4.60702@attbi.com... > At least GNAT agrees with me. ;-) Seriously I think that Tucker may be > correct, "by the book." But to not be able to declare Leaf.Initialize > as overriding defeats the whole point. Sigh. So now even if we adopt > my solution or the new syntax, we still have to change 7.3.1 to get the > definition of overriding to agree with the (to me) commonsense definition. Well one problem is that some people (as in me) think that Tucker's behavior is common sense. Although either way, it is best to have the compilers agree ;) -CRM