From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <bf36dd33-b876-407a-849e-988b58c4e763@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<54839eeb-fe35-49eb-9c67-41a81879f8fd@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
	<3f59f2ec-c222-421f-91ba-0247a8268fdb@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.108.203.209
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240868552 1590 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2009 21:42:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.108.203.209;
	posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7)
	Gecko/2009030810 Iceweasel/3.0.7 (Debian-3.0.7-1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5574
Date: 2009-04-27T14:42:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vadim Godunko wrote on comp.lang.ada:
> Eric Hughes <eric....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 9:05=A0am, Vadim Godunko <vgodu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The answer depends from another question: did you report this bug to
>>> AdaCore?
>
>> If you can show me where on the sitehttp://libre.adacore.com/there's
>> a place to report anything, I'd be pleased to see it.
>
> $ gnatmake --help
>
> <skip>
>
> Report bugs to rep...@adacore.com
>
> :-)

That's the canonical answer but, unfortunately, AdaCore's bug database
is private.  The other solutions that Samuel mentioned feature public
and searchable bug databases. I guess that, to get the best of both
worlds, the OP should report the problem both to AdaCore (for
resulution, hopefully, in the next GPL Edition) and to the GCC bug
database (to document the bug publicly and keep track of when the fix
lands into GCC).

--
Ludovic Brenta.