From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,669a0df36b2c7d06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-14 15:43:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!skynet.be!skynet.be!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!82-43-33-75.cable.ubr01.croy.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail From: "Nick Roberts" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: coding 'Output Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:45:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-43-33-75.cable.ubr01.croy.blueyonder.co.uk (82.43.33.75) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1058222610 9858610 82.43.33.75 (16 [25716]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40269 Date: 2003-07-14T23:45:17+01:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:nasQa.56566$N7.7193@sccrnsc03... > What's the best way to do something like X'Output when > type X only has part of the story? Say "type X is array ..." > but X is an array of sampled signal and there's an > associated sampling rate etc. Making > type X (Rate : Positive; Length : Positive) is > record > Data : Data_Array(1 .. Length); > would require slice assignments to/from Data and Data is > typically large, so that's not a good solution. Why is this (putting the array and other info into a record type) not a good solution? What have large slices got to do with it? -- Nick Roberts Jabber: debater@charente.de [ICQ: 159718630]