From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,256d88732296b589,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-27 11:30:45 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!gatech!ncar!csn!news.sinet.slb.com!bayleaf!benson From: benson@felixstowe.em.slb.com (Ewan Benson) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: generic call backs Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 17:08:43 Organization: Schlumberger Industries Electricity Management Distribution: world Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: bayleaf.felixstowe.em.slb.com Keywords: with X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A] Date: 1994-09-27T17:08:43+00:00 List-Id: Hi, I'm posting this for a (remote) colleague who doesn't have access to the net at present (and I haven't seen a FAQ for this group) so here goes. He has two packages A and B Package A contains a 'with B' Package B contains a call to a subroutine in A, but for his own reasons he does not want to use a 'with B' in package A. He's convinced it can be done but can't find any info in his Booch reference. Any help in this direction would be gratefully received Thanks for your patience Ewan (going back to comp.lang.c and the int main (void) flames !!) ############################################################################ # Ewan Benson # # # Schlumberger Industries Electricity Management # # # # For every action there # # E-Mail benson@felixstowe.em.slb.com # is an equal and # # Tel ++ 44 394 694472 # opposite criticism. # # Fax ++ 44 394 694444 # # # # # ############################################################################