From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 22:24:13 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: + in ada
Date: 22 Oct 2003 22:24:13 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <bebbba07.0310222124.6f5816a3@posting.google.com>
References: <3F900F35.50203@comcast.net> <3F92B607.809@comcast.net>
 <bebbba07.0310191559.5d9fa9@posting.google.com>
 <bmvrjt$1r9c$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <3F937806.9080205@comcast.net>
 <bebbba07.0310202343.18c04810@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbpaaju.ns.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <bebbba07.0310212313.6f50d3cf@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbpchsk.oa.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <bebbba07.0310221021.1a0642fd@posting.google.com>
 <bn6kos$u4o1s$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.194.87.148
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066886653 20403 127.0.0.1 (23 Oct 2003 05:24:13
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 05:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1492
Date: 2003-10-22T22:24:13-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <ada.rocks@jlfencey.com> wrote in message news:<bn6kos$u4o1s$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> Russ wrote:
> 
> >That's the most intelligent thing you've said yet, dude. If you're
> >representative of the level of intelligence on this forum, then that
> >explains the reception I have received.

I just love how you cut out the line I was replying to. Oh, it wasn't
relevant, I guess. Then you cut out the last sentence of my paragraph.
Nice trick. Shit, you should be writing for the New York Times.

> Sorry, folks. But enough is enough.

It sure is, 'Gadget'.