From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-15 21:31:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: + in ada Date: 15 Oct 2003 21:31:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <49cbf610.0310101231.2358762a@posting.google.com> <1066224357.499523@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.194.87.148 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1066278689 19157 127.0.0.1 (16 Oct 2003 04:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:942 Date: 2003-10-15T21:31:29-07:00 List-Id: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler wrote in message news:... > Hyman Rosen wrote: > >Even in COBOL you could say "ADD A TO B." > > You can already do it in Ada, too: > > |Add (A, To => B); When I see stuff like this, it offends my sense of elegance in numerical programming. I don't claim to be a top expert in this area, but a few years ago I did write software for an experimental real-time DGPS/INS precision landing system (in C++). I took pride in my code, and I would have been disgusted to see something like "Add (A, To => B)" anywhere in my code. I heard an interesting little story once about the Queen of England asking Louis Armstrong (I think it was) about the appeal of jazz. I don't remember his exact reply, but it was something to the effect of, "If you have to ask, you don't get it." And I say, if you think "Add (A, To => B)" is as clean and clear as "B :+ A", you don't get it. But that's just my opinion, of course.