From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-13 10:55:18 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
Date: 13 Jun 2003 10:55:17 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <bebbba07.0306130955.6045e8bd@posting.google.com>
References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com>
 <uhe6zw201.fsf@nasa.gov> <bebbba07.0306092233.2365dbd5@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbebc2b.ht.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bebbba07.0306101640.19178e81@posting.google.com>
 <3EE7CC70.E1FD3A67@adaworks.com>
 <bebbba07.0306121116.33e4741@posting.google.com>
 <3EE90854.6456A81E@adaworks.com>
 <bebbba07.0306122141.61933dcb@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbejcua.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.102.146.44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1055526918 19861 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2003 17:55:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jun 2003 17:55:18 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39136
Date: 2003-06-13T17:55:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message news:<slrnbejcua.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>...
> Russ wrote:
> > Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com> wrote in message news:<3EE90854.6456A81E@adaworks.com>...
> >> Rather, Ada's goal has been to more readable, as well as more reliable.
> > 
> > I appreciate your position, but I respectfully disagree.
> 
> You disagree on the design goals of Ada?

No, I disagree with his "position," which is exactly what I wrote. His
"position" is that "+=" conflicts with the design goals of Ada. That's
what I disagree with.