From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-10 17:40:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X Date: 10 Jun 2003 17:40:36 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.102.146.44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1055292036 12989 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2003 00:40:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jun 2003 00:40:36 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38943 Date: 2003-06-11T00:40:36+00:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote in message news:... > Russ wrote: > > Secondly, I'll bet that far more programmers use "+=", when given the > > option, than don't. How many C++ or Python programmers do you think > > write var1 = var1 + var2 when they can write var1 += var2? Not many > > good ones, I'll bet. > > What about *= and /= ? I think those get used quite a bit too, though probably not as much as += and -=. That applies to C++, Java, Python, and Perl -- four of the most popular languages around. So I think it is safe to say that the vast majority of experienced programmers picking up Ada as a "second" language will have no problem whatsoever with those operators. In fact, I'll bet a lot of them will wish Ada had those operators. As for the other more obscure assignment operators, >>=, <<=, &=, ^=, and |=, they are unnecessary.