From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-17 22:27:33 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: status of Ada STL?
Date: 17 Jun 2002 22:27:32 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <bebbba07.0206172127.c24fb47@posting.google.com>
References: <bebbba07.0206132321.23d72ac8@posting.google.com>
 <aedgoc$to7$1@news.iucc.ac.il>
 <bebbba07.0206151051.1c25cf1e@posting.google.com> <uu1o31wbb.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bebbba07.0206161023.6073fd3a@posting.google.com>
 <3d0ce154_5@news.bluewin.ch> <3D0D4274.6C5E02F9@acm.org>
 <bebbba07.0206162248.45b6174e@posting.google.com> <u1yb5n7v3.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.194.87.148
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1024378053 13106 127.0.0.1 (18 Jun 2002 05:27:33
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jun 2002 05:27:33 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26204
Date: 2002-06-18T05:27:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:<u1yb5n7v3.fsf@wanadoo.fr>...
> 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) writes:
> 
> > Certainly "=" is better than ":=" for assignment, but if you don't
> > think so, my proposal WOULD NOT STOP YOU FROM USING :=. LET ME REPEAT:
> > MY PROPOSAL WOULD NOT STOP YOU FROM USING := FOR ASSINGMENT.
> 
> So it is even worse than I thought since you are proposing to accept different
> syntax for the same construct...

You are just realizing that now? Please see the first paragraph of my
proposal, and let me know what is unclear about it.