From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a33a1c715f62adf7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-15 23:14:56 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: High Dependability Computing Consortium
Date: 15 May 2002 23:14:56 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <bebbba07.0205152214.fc253e7@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.194.87.148
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1021529696 8495 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2002 06:14:56
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 May 2002 06:14:56 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24159
Date: 2002-05-16T06:14:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability
Computing Consortium

http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html

Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to
Ada? Thanks.