From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,751d508677a5add1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!API-DIGITAL.COM-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:10:52 -0500 From: "Marc A. Criley" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA made me hate programming References: <8f469661-370c-4484-82d8-f1b365455e0f@w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <7865d$4c3125c1$433a4efa$24658@API-DIGITAL.COM> <746c$4c3253ae$433a4efa$25085@API-DIGITAL.COM> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Organization: UseNetServer.com X-Trace: beadd4c33c62ee69feb5f30251 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:13213 Date: 2010-07-06T19:10:52-05:00 List-Id: On 07/06/2010 02:55 PM, anon@att.net wrote: > I believe it was also under Bush jr that a story also broke by CNN that > Bush's people were thrown for a loop. CNN know it first and that put > egg on a few faces. Bush himself comment on this one. Either A) you are making this up, or B) reporting hearsay/rumor as fact. > Also, if you want to know who said that missile were hack then you do > the research. My position is that there is no reputable report stating that missile in-flight updates were hacked. There is no research for me to do. I can't prove a negative, you simply need to provide one reputable counterexample. I'll wait... > Now, I never use Wikipedia for reference, to easy for someone to modify, > Because if I check Wikipedia one day the last mod date may change by the > next day. A *reliable* article on Wikipedia will include reference links to establish its credibility. Those references can be independently checked and verified. I've seen no reliable links from you for *any* claim you've made so far. > As for being "skeptical" I am total skeptical around here of most of this > type of posts. You appear to be severely lacking in skepticism about *your own* claims, since you follow-up a contested, unsupported claim with more unsupported claims. When I present a factual claim, I either include the reference or have it ready if questioned. When I espouse an opinion I note it as an opinion, and stand ready to debate it. My *opinion* is that "anon" is a poser. > And what I know of the aerospace and NASA would fill volumes. Your postings, from which a "picture" of your knowledge, experience, and abilities emerges, shows no evidence of this. And based on that "picture", this claim is in fact contraindicated. > Because you need know who you are talking to. That's true..."anon". Marc A. Criley http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=marc+a+criley+-information