From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3cb83afdaa0ee626
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: KK6GM <mjsilva@scriptoriumdesigns.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access types - what's happening here?
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <be7c9ee2-1c1e-4046-9d08-d25a9ca433d5@z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <5f5003e9-4b34-4489-be37-360f5c9063b9@e34g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vc985pznxmjfy8@garhos> <op.vc9874f2xmjfy8@garhos>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.216.160.90
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1274827644 14473 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2010 22:47:24
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 22:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.216.160.90;
	posting-account=qZVz2QoAAAAN9WxYp-9jYb7jORc4Zqwt
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0;
	Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
	3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; AskTB5.2),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11997
Date: 2010-05-25T15:47:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 25, 3:39=A0pm, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57)
<yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Le Wed, 26 May 2010 00:38:03 +0200, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) =A0

> =A0 =A0 =A0 Old_Serial_Number :=3D Serial_Number("Lovelace, Ada");
> =A0 =A0 =A0 Old_Serial_Number.all :=3D New_Serial_Number;

Yes, after a few more minutes thinking about it I see what's
happening.  The value of New_Serial_Number is being stored via the
unnamed access value returned by Serial_Number().