From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,76049ee79683afc0
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr2858058pbc.0.1339690518776;
        Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni50366pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: onox <denkpadje@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: so is ada as good as python or ruby for website building? I hate
 broken website so safety sounds very very nice
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <be7824a3-ce06-4da8-b0dc-d5ee2d766431@googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <56fec872-f53a-4937-ac7b-e1f6c88a99dd@qq9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.139.123.174
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1339690518 7559 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2012 16:15:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:15:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: 
 <56fec872-f53a-4937-ac7b-e1f6c88a99dd@qq9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=82.139.123.174;
 posting-account=BtkjvAoAAADwEquGb07eykXfyiDMOxfl
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-06-14T09:01:04-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:27:19 PM UTC+2, quiet_lad wrote:
> aws seems competent as well
> 
> is handling sessions safe too? how about cacheing database query or
> URL routing? a la memcached or dancer[perl]?

If you're looking for a memcached client: see https://github.com/rtyler/memcache-ada